Restitution Awards Obtained During Criminal Cases
Overview
Restitution in a human trafficking criminal case may not be limited to the common remedies, such as payment from property damage, medical expenses, and psychological expenses. Because human trafficking victims are forced to work for free, many jurisdictions allow for restitution for unpaid wages from the time the victim was trafficked, and in many of those jurisdictions, such restitution is mandatory.
Federal court judges must award restitution to victims of human trafficking. The Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 contains a statute mandating this restitution in 18 U.S.C. section 1593. This statute requires the convicted traffickers to pay the actual losses they caused the victim and also the greater of either the defendant’s ill-gotten gains or the value of the victims’ labor. Many states have incorporated similar statutory provisions in state court, which are listed below.
Despite these mandatory restitution provisions, many survivors go uncompensated because restitution is never requested from the prosecution or ordered by the judge. If you are an advocate for a survivor or a prosecutor, follow these steps to provide the best opportunity for full restitution for the survivor:
Step One: Consult with the survivor and preserve receipts.
Have the survivor create a declaration that details:
When he or she was trafficked
The nature of the services or labor
The cost of the service or labor for the buyer
Congress did not specify that restitution will only be distributed for legal services and labor. Mandatory restitution shall be awarded even when the conduct is illegal. In those circumstances, the profit the trafficker made off the survivor should be calculated--or estimated--for restitution.
The total days and hours spent doing the service or labor
What, if anything, did the trafficker pay the victim
Have the survivor collect any receipts or create a declaration with the survivor’s best estimate as to the costs of the following:
Property damage by trafficker
Medical expenses
Psychological expenses
Expenses from relocation
Costs of necessary transportation
Cost of investigation, attorney’s fees, and court-related costs (such as victim advocate fees)
Step Two: Determine jurisdiction.
If federal, there is a mandatory restitution to compensate victims following the conviction of the trafficker.
If in a state court, refer to either the general restitution statute in your state or the specific human-trafficking restitution statutes listed below.
Step Three: Inform the prosecutor and the judge of the mandatory restitution statutes.
Research has shown that even though there are mandatory restitution statutes, restitution is seldom sought out by prosecutors. As an advocate for the survivor, inform the survivor of his or her statutory rights and recommend reaching out the prosecutorial agency about restitution. Even then, judges may be hesitant to order restitution, despite the statutory provision. As a prosecutor or counsel for the survivor, inform the judge of the statutory law and develop a record for appeal.
Step Four: Determine alternative means of restitution.
If restitution is ordered, the convicted trafficker may not make payments. The trafficker is in violation of a court order, and the court needs to be notified of the violation. There may also be state-funded victim assistance available for survivors, some of which have been included in the statutes listed below.
State-Specific Restitution Statutes
No Human Trafficking-Specific Restitution Statutes; Refer to General Criminal Restitution Statutes
Alaska
Arkansas
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Georgia
Kentucky
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Minnesota
Montana
Nebraska
New York
Oregon
South Dakota
Utah
Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin
Mandatory Restitution
Colorado: Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 18-1.3-603(9) (2019),
Mississippi: Miss. Code Ann. § 97-3-54.6 (2013).
Missouri: Mo. Rev. Stat. § 566.218 (2017).
New Hampshire: N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 633:10 (2010).
Oklahoma: Okla. Stat. 21, § 748 (2008).
South Carolina: S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-2040 (2015).
Texas: Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 42.0372 (2011) (limited to minors).
West Virginia: W. Va. Code § 61-14-7 (2017).
Wyoming: Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-710 (2013).
Mandatory Restitution and the greater of either (1) the gross income or value to the defendant of the victim’s labor services or (2) the value of the victim’s labor as guaranteed under the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Arizona: Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-1309 (2017).
California: Cal. Penal Code § 1202.4(q) (2019).
Hawaii: Haw. Rev. Stat. § 707-785 (2011).
Idaho: Idaho Code § 18-8604 (2006).
Illinois: 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/10-9 (effective 2015-2019).
Indiana: Ind. Code § 35-42-3.5-2 (2018).
Iowa: Iowa Code § 710A.4 (2006).
Kansas: Kan. Stat. Ann. § 22-3424 (2019) (multiplies available restitution by three).
Louisiana: La. Stat. Ann. § 15:539.3 (2014).
New Jersey: N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:13-8 (2013).
New Mexico: N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-52-1 (2008).
North Carolina: N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-43.20 (2018).
North Dakota: N.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-41-09 (2015).
Ohio: Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2929.18 (2019).
Rhode Island: 11 R.I. Gen. laws § 11-67.1-10 (2017).
Tennessee: Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-13-307 (2012), 39-13-308 (2008).
Permissible Restitution, at the Court’s Discretion
Alabama: Ala. Code § 13A-6-155 (2019).
Michigan: Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.462f (2017).
Nevada: Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.469 (2015).
Pennsylvania: 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3020 (2014).
Vermont: Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7043 (2019).
Assistance Funds for Victims of Human Trafficking
Florida: Fla. Stat. § 960.196 (2019).
Hawaii: Haw. Rev. Stat. § 706-650.5 (2016).
Kansas: Kan. Stat. Ann. § 75-758 (2013).
Louisiana: La. Stat. Ann. § 46:2161 (2014).
Minnesota: Minn. Stat. § 299A.795 (2006).
Mississippi: Miss. Code. Ann. § 97-3-54.8 (2019).
Nebraska: Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-1429.02 (2015).
New Mexico: N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-52-2 (2013).
New York: N.Y. Soc. Serv. Law § 483-bb (2018).
North Carolina: N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-43.20 (2018).
Resources
If you are interested in how judges are reviewing restitution claims in federal court, please review this Judges’ Resource Guide provided by the Human Trafficking Institute: https://www.traffickinginstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Restitution-Article_Updated-2019-05-WEB.pdf.
If you are interested in case law where restitution was not ordered when it should have been, please review this resource provided by National Crime Victim and Law Institute and Lewis & Clark Law School: https://law.lclark.edu/live/files/16052-ncvlivlrestitution-for-trafficking-victims---call.
If you are interested in policy concerns with prosecutors not asking for and judges not ordering restitution, please see these resources provided by The Human Trafficking Legal Center; Hilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale, and Dorr, LLP; and Tafficking Matters; http://www.htlegalcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2018-Mandatory-Restitution-Report.pdf and https://www.traffickingmatters.com/human-trafficking-legal-center-publishes-2018-restitution-report/.